Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Washington v. Fort Scott Community College, Board of Trustees of, et al
as 2:2022cv02393
Plaintiff:
Natasha Washington
Defendant:
Board of Trustees of Fort Scott Community College, Carson Hunter and Fort Scott Community College, Board of Trustees of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hoyt v. USD 234 Fort Scott et al
as 2:2022cv02387
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Hoyt
Defendant:
USD 234 Fort Scott, Ted Hessong and Gina Shelton
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Velocity Manufacturing Company, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2020cv02637
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Velocity Manufacturing Company, LLC and Velocity Manufacturing Company, LLC doing business as Fort Scott Munitions
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01126
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv04107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Winglet Technology, LLC v. Felker
as 6:2018cv01117
Plaintiff:
Winglet Technology, LLC
Defendant:
Fort Felker
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hill v. Fort Leavenworth United States Disciplinary Barracks et al
as 5:2016cv03220
Plaintiff:
Steven E. Hill
Defendant:
Fort Leavenworth United States Disciplinary Barracks and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hawkins v. Mercy Hospital of Fort Scott, Kansas et al
as 2:2014cv02405
Plaintiff:
Clessa Hawkins
Defendant:
Marc Enyart , Roger Parris , Amy Sachau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
