Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00101
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Fowler et al v. Forest River, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Peter L. Fowler and Kimberly Amanda Fowler
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Fowler v. Echo Lake Foods, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Todd Fowler
Defendant:
Echo Lake Foods, Inc.
Other:
Anthony Stites
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Tucker v. CME Lending Group LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00299
Plaintiff:
Travante Tyvaugn Tucker
Defendant:
CME Lending Group LLC, Daniel Fowler and James Metcalf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Larmer v. Fowler et al
as 1:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
Todd Larmer
Defendant:
Samuel Fowler, Matt Sneed and Grant County of the State of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HILL v. GAMBILL et al
as 2:2022cv00443
Plaintiff:
JAMES K. HILL
Defendant:
HUNTER GAMBILL, JOHNNIE BOHNERT, JOSH CLARKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WEATHERSPOON v. EMPIRE BEAUTY SCHOOL et al
as 1:2022cv01638
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE WEATHERSPOON
Defendant:
EMPIRE BEAUTY SCHOOL, KAVA RAYL, TANIA FOWLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fowler v. USA
as 3:2022cv00527
Petitioner:
Donyea Fowler
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
FOWLER v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv06586
Plaintiff:
CHARLES H. FOWLER
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
