Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Stinson v. Mark Yates and Wall & Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02077
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson
Defendant:
Mark Yates, Wall & Associates, Inc., John P. Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Perry v. Shelby County Criminal Justice Center Prosecutor's Office et al
as 2:2023cv02762
Petitioner:
Courtney Perry
Respondent:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center Prosecutor's Office, Debbie Nichols, Bill Odom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stinson v. Fowlkes, et al
as 2:2022cv02694
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
John T. Fowlkes, Jr., Damon Keith Griffin, Nathan Patrick Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson v. Fowlkes et al
as 2:2021cv02148
Plaintiff:
Mark Stinson
Defendant:
Joedae L. Jenkins, John T. Fowlkes, Jr., Arthur E. Quinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Fowlkes
as 2:2020cv02105
Defendant:
John T. Fowlkes, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Kevin Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. Campbell et al
as 1:2016cv00098
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Smith Russell
Defendant:
Otis Campbell, Jr., Ellen Fowlkes, Amanda Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conner v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2015cv02833
Plaintiff:
Harry Conner
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, MetLife Inc., John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Modrall v. The Honorable Joe Fowlkes
as 2:2015cv02331
Plaintiff:
Robert Gregory Modrall
Defendant:
The Honorable Joe Fowlkes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Modrall v. Killian et al (PLR2)
as 1:2014cv00327
Plaintiff:
Robert G Modrall
Defendant:
William C Killian, Bill Haslam, Claude Ramsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Modrall v. Carter et al
as 1:2014cv00257
Plaintiff:
Robert G Modrall
Defendant:
William B Carter, Susan K Lee, Bob Corker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
