Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Wells v. Ray
as 3:2023cv00573
Petitioner:
Andrivia Frances Wells
Respondent:
FNU Ray
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
France v. Brown et al
as 5:2022ct03397
Plaintiff:
William France and William Anthony France
Defendant:
Sargeant Brown, Lt. Avery, Officer Jetevu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRANCE v. MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 1:2022cv00703
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM FRANCE
Defendant:
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRANCE v. COUNTY'S POLICE DEPARTMENT IN FORSYTH COUNTY
as 1:2022cv00549
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM FRANCE
Defendant:
COUNTY'S POLICE DEPARTMENT IN FORSYTH COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRANCE v. VEAL et al
as 1:2022cv00407
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A. FRANCE
Defendant:
L. VEAL, LAVALLEY, B. FERGUSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
France v. Central Prison
as 5:2022ct03136
Plaintiff:
William France
Defendant:
Central Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRANCE v. CENTRAL PRISON
as 1:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A. FRANCE
Defendant:
CENTRAL PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
France v. Hardee et al
as 5:2022ct03055
Plaintiff:
William France
Defendant:
Michael Hardee, Commissioner of Pris Todd Ishee, FNU Hendricks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRANCE v. WINSTON SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A. FRANCE
Defendant:
WINSTON SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRANCE v. WINSTON SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A. FRANCE
Defendant:
WINSTON SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
