Cases 21 - 30 of 68
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Palmer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv05575
Plaintiff:
Sarah Frances Palmer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
In re: Amy Frances Kunkel-Patterson
as 2:2018rd00066
Defendant:
Amy Frances Kunkel-Patterson
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Ju v. Lacombe et al
as 3:2018cv05309
Plaintiff:
Frances Du Ju
Defendant:
Maurice Lacombe, Airbnb Inc, State of Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ju v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2017cv06082
Plaintiff:
Frances Du Ju
Defendant:
State of Washington, City of Vancouver , John O'Neill and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
AmTrust International Underwriters Limited v. The Pass LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01486
Plaintiff:
AmTrust International Underwriters Limited
Defendant:
The Pass LLC , High Country Contractors, Inc, Global Construction Solutions, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowes v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv05401
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Sharon Frances Irene Bowes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LVB-Odgen Marketing Corporation v. Dean et al
as 2:2017cv00528
Petitioner:
LVB-Odgen Marketing Corporation
Respondent:
Henry Dean and Park Place Motors Ltd
Defendant:
Bingo Investments, LLC , David Bingham , Sharon G Bingham and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Ladwig v. Berryhill
as 2:2017cv00518
Plaintiff:
Colleen Frances Ladwig
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LVB-Odgen Marketing Corporation v. Dean et al
as 2:2017mc00022
Petitioner:
LVB-Odgen Marketing Corporation
Respondent:
Henry Dean and Park Place Motors Ltd
Defendant:
Bingo Investments, LLC , David Bingham , Sharon G Bingham and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
