Cases 1 - 10 of 1,434
Francis Tulanda v. Roberto A. Arias
as 2:2024cv03997
Petitioner:
Francis Tulanda
Respondent:
Acting Warden Roberto A. Arias
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winsor v. Shockwave Medical, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv02727
Plaintiff:
Jane Winsor
Defendant:
Shockwave Medical, Inc., Ray Larkin, Doug Godshall and others
Phillips v. General Motors LLC
as 1:2024cv00537
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Francis Phillips
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
C. Francis v. Robert Luna et al
as 2:2024cv03745
Plaintiff:
C. FRANCIS
Defendant:
ROBERT LUNA and DEPUTY LEVERNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
C. Francis v. Robert Luna et al
as 2:2024cv03740
Plaintiff:
C. FRANCIS
Defendant:
ROBERT LUNA and SGT. VILLASENOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Sean Paul et al
as 2:2024cv03602
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Sean Paul, Troy Donald Jamerson, Ho Chi Mihn City and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Martin Francis Byrnes v. James Robert Orr
as 2:2024cv03503
Plaintiff:
Martin Francis Byrnes
Defendant:
James Robert Orr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Wang v. Peletta
as 4:2024cv02461
Plaintiff:
Francis Wang
Defendant:
Brian Peletta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Nawsheen Duffaydar v. Sonder Holdings Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02952
Plaintiff:
Nawsheen Duffaydar
Defendant:
Sonder Holdings Inc., Francis Davidson, Chris Berry and others
Benjamin Melendez et al v. Culture Cannabis Club et al
as 2:2024cv02926
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN MELENDEZ, RANJEET PANNU and BIKRAMJIT SINGH PANNU
Defendant:
CULTURE CANNABIS CLUB, SKYBOX HOLDINGS 81, MAMMOTH LEGEND CONSULTING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
