Cases 41 - 50 of 833
Franks v. Saint Joesph County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv01071
Plaintiff:
Robert Steven Franks
Defendant:
Saint Joesph County Jail and Russel Olmstead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CALLANTINE v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00559
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY W. CALLANTINE
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, ELIZABETH BENNETT, SAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSA v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00548
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL ROSA, III
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, WHITNEY MOORE, SAMUEL J. BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GALINDO v. CENTURION, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00556
Plaintiff:
MARCO GALINDO
Defendant:
CENTURION, LLC, CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, SAMUEL BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. VANIHEL
as 2:2023cv00546
Plaintiff:
VICK L. JOHNSON
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HAWKINS-EL v. FISCHER et al
as 2:2023cv00549
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. HAWKINS-EL
Defendant:
K. FISCHER, PORTER-MARTS, MATT LEHOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARK v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00540
Plaintiff:
DOMINIQUE CLARK
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILMORE, RUSSELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCAULEY v. VANIHEL
as 2:2023cv00541
Petitioner:
JOSHUA MCCAULEY
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rolon v. Frank et al
as 4:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Rivera Rolon
Defendant:
Eric Frank and Norfolk Southern Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
LYONS v. VANIHEL
as 2:2023cv00526
Plaintiff:
CALVIN LYONS
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
