Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Rosevelt: Hopper v. State of NC et al
as 3:2022cv00259
Plaintiff:
Brandace Jarreau Rosevelt: Hopper
Defendant:
State of NC, Lawrence W. Blake doing business as Substitute Trustee Services Inc., Hutchens Law Firm LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Koon v. Whitney, et al
as 1:2019cv00213
Petitioner:
Rodney A. Koon
Respondent:
Bryan Wells and Frank D. Whitney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Koon v. Whitney, et al
as 5:2019hc02173
Petitioner:
Rodney A. Koon
Respondent:
Bryan K. Wells and Frank D. Whitney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Van Dyke v. Foster et al
as 1:2016cv00134
Plaintiff:
Dennis Roger Van Dyke
Defendant:
Rick Foster, Max O. Cogburn, Scott D Aldridge and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Dyke v. U.S. Federal Department of Correction et al
as 1:2016cv00133
Plaintiff:
Dennis Roger Van Dyke
Defendant:
U.S. Federal Department of Correction, Lacey Thornburg, Charles McKeller and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Dyke v. Cogburn et al
as 1:2016cv00114
Plaintiff:
Dennis R. Van Dyke
Defendant:
Max Cogburn, Jr., Frank D. Whitney, Graham C. Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Dyke v. Whitney et al
as 1:2016cv00097
Plaintiff:
Dennis Roger Van Dyke
Defendant:
Frank D. Whitney, Graham C. Mullen and Cursed No Honor Criminal Judges Like the Two Above Cursed No Honor Judges
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Dyke v. Whitney et al
as 1:2016cv00074
Plaintiff:
Dennis Roger Van Dyke
Defendant:
Frank D. Whitney and Green CI
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucky v. United States of America et al
as 5:2015ct03237
Plaintiff:
Melvin Lee Lucky
Defendant:
United States of America and Frank D. Whitney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Dyke
as 1:2015cv00107
Plaintiff:
Dennis R. Van Dyke
Defendant:
Frank D. Whitney, Robert James Davis, 12 Jury Members and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
