Cases 1 - 9 of 9
United States of America v. Ashe (Seng)
as 18-1725
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
John W. Ashe, Francis Lorenzo, AKA Frank Lorenzo, Jeff C. Yin, AKA Yin Chuan and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Ng Lap Seng, AKA David Ng, AKA David Ng Lap Seng
Princeton Developments, LLC v. Baylor et al
as 4:2011cv04471
Plaintiff:
Princeton Developments, LLC
Defendant:
Brynee K Baylor, Baylior & Jackson, PLLC, The Milan Group, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kuman Banque, LLC v. Baylor et al
as 3:2011cv04472
Plaintiff:
Kuman Banque, LLC
Defendant:
Brynee K. Baylor, Baylor & Jackson, PLLC, The Milan Group, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Princeton Developments, LLC v. Baylor et al
as 5:2011cv04471
Plaintiff:
Princeton Developments, LLC
Defendant:
Brynee K Baylor, Baylior & Jackson, PLLC, The Milan Group, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frank Giovinco v. Kathy Mendoza-Power
as 09-16358
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANK LORENZO GIOVINCO
Respondent - Appellee:
KATHY MENDOZA-POWERS, Warden
Frank Giovinco v. Tom Carey, et al
as 09-16250
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANK LORENZO GIOVINCO
Respondent - Appellee:
TOM L. CAREY, Warden, EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, Jr., PAULA PAYNTER, Records Supervisor and others
QPL, Inc. v. Davis Rebar, Inc.
as 2:2008cv04614
Plaintiff:
QPL, Inc.
Defendant:
Davis Rebar, Inc., Davis Rebar, Inc., Davis Rebar, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
Davis Rebar, Inc., Davis Rebar, Inc., Davis Rebar, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant:
Fred Cortes, Frank Lorenzo and QPL, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Giovinco v. Mendoza-Powers
as 1:2007cv00585
Petitioner:
Frank Lorenzo Giovinco
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Giovinco v. Mendoza-Powers
as 3:2007cv01068
Petitioner:
Frank Lorenzo Giovinco
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
