Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
TAYLOR v. MASON et al
as 2:2023cv00457
Petitioner: FRANK TAYLOR, JR.
Respondent: BERNADETTE MASON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TAYLOR v. MASON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv05054
Petitioner: FRANK TAYLOR, JR.
Respondent: BERNADETTE MASON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor, Jr. v. Yampolsky et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00294
Plaintiff: Frank Taylor, Jr.
Defendant: Dr. Yampolsky, Superintendent Sommers, Yhetti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01443
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv03017
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
TAYLOR et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv66008
Plaintiff: LOIS TAYLOR and FRANK TAYLOR
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., FLEXITALLIC, INC., GAF CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YOUNG v. FORD et al
as 2:2008cv03159
Plaintiff: DANA E. YOUNG, SR.
Defendant: WILLIAM E. FORD, JAMES B. MARTIN, JANE ROACH and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCLOUGHLIN et al v. FALCICCHIO et al
as 1:2007cv05624
Plaintiff: ROBERT MCLOUGHLIN, THOMAS EDWARD MCLOUGHLIN and ROBERT MCLOUGHLIN
Defendant: NICHOLAS WILLIAM FALCICCHIO, JOSHUA STEVEN GIERCYK, DENNIS FELSING, SR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?