Cases 1 - 10 of 232
Franklin v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00804
Petitioner:
Charles L. Franklin
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris v. FCI El Reno
as 4:2023cv00999
Petitioner:
Tom Morris and Tom Franklin Morris
Respondent:
FCI El Reno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Haley v. Brewer
as 23-60366
Petitioner / Appellant:
Russell Haley
Respondent / Appellee:
Franklin Brewer
Franklin v. Hooper
as 23-30425
Petitioner / Appellant:
Charles Franklin
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Franklin v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv00589
Petitioner:
Demond Franklin
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
West v. Lumpkin
as 23-10438
Petitioner / Appellant:
David Franklin West
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
West v. Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 3:2022cv00445
Petitioner:
David Franklin West
Respondent:
Board of Pardons and Paroles, Maribel Olvera, Jennifer Lucero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Motley v. Lumpkin
as 3:2022cv00389
Petitioner:
Franklin D. Motley
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Franklin v. McClure
as 3:2022cv00599
Plaintiff:
Mario Franklin
Defendant:
Marc McClure
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bell v. Lumpkin
as 22-20528
Petitioner / Appellant:
John Franklin Bell
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
