Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,595
v. Franklin et al
as 1:2024cv01233
Not Yet Classified: Chantay D. Franklin and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Richardson, III v. Third Coast Auto Group, LP
as 1:2024cv00437
Plaintiff: Franklin Richardson, III
Defendant: Third Coast Auto Group, LP
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Camus, et al. v. Sharp Healthcare
as 24-2520
Plaintiff: HANNAH COUSIN, DEANNA FRANKLIN-PITTMAN, LINDA CAMUS and others
Defendant: SHARP HEALTHCARE
Cousin, et al. v. Sharp Healthcare
as 24-2511
Plaintiff: HANNAH COUSIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LINDA CAMUS, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, DEANNA FRANKLIN-PITTMAN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: SHARP HEALTHCARE
USA v. Torey Franklin
as 24-1307
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: TOREY FRANKLIN
United States v. Bruce Franklin
as 24-1764
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Bruce Franklin
United States v. Franklin Bell
as 24-1703
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Franklin Bell
Jeton Lita/Simon Bolivar Express Trust v. Calhoun et al
as 2:2024cv02714
Plaintiff: Jeton Lita/Simon Bolivar Express Trust
Defendant: Brad C. Calhoun, Teachers Federal Credit Union, Timothy M. Southerton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Benshoof v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Seattle
as 24-1958
Petitioner: KURT BENSHOOF
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Interested Party: FREYA BRIER, MOSHE ADMON, CITY OF SEATTLE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01154
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?