Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Meor Adlin, et al v. All Nippon Airways
as 23-15118
Not Classified By Court:
In re: TRANSPACIFIC PASSENGER AIR TRANSPORTATION ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MEOR ADLIN, FRANKLIN AJAYE, ANDREW BARTON and others
Appellant:
XANADU CORP. and DAVID GOULD
Defendant:
ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS
Meor Adlin, et al v. All Nippon Airways, et al
as 22-16634
Not Classified By Court:
In re: TRANSPACIFIC PASSENGER AIR TRANSPORTATION ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MEOR ADLIN, FRANKLIN AJAYE, ANDREW BARTON and others
Appellant:
XANADU CORP.
Defendant:
ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS, MALAYSIA AIRLINES, UNITED AIRLINES and others
Winn Dixie Stores, et al v. Eastern Mushroom Marketing Cooperative, et al
as 22-2377
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WINN DIXIE STORES and BI LO HOLDING LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
EASTERN MUSHROOM MARKETING COOPERATIVE
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT A. FERANTO, JR., CARDILE MUSHROOMS INC, CARDILE BROTHERS MUSHROOMS PACKAGING and others
Defendant:
MD BASCIANI & SONS INC
In re: Treasury Securities Auc
as 22-943
Plaintiff:
Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Beaver County Employees' Retirement Fund, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Marc Federighi, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael St. John, BNP Paribas Securities Corp., Bank of Nova Scotia, New York Agency and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
City of Pontiac Police and Fire Retirement System, On behalf of itself and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
BMO Capital Markets Corp., CIBC World Markets Corp., Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. and others
County of Nassau et al v. Actavis Holdco US, Inc. et. al.
as 2:2020cv00065
Defendant:
PLIVA, INC., MYLAN INC, DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES INC. and others
Plaintiff:
County of Clinton, County of Allegany, County of Oswego and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
County of Nassau et al v. Actavis Holdco US, Inc. et. al.
as 2:2019cv07071
Defendant:
Heritage Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Pliva, Inc., Sandoz, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
County of Clinton, County of Allegany, County of Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Williams, Sr. et al v. Maryland Mutual Mortgage, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01464
Defendant:
Corey J. Anderson, Hawk Mortgage Group, LLC, Maryland Mutual Mortgage, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin Robinson, Susan Enochs, Dorothy Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2607
California, State of v. Aisan Industry Co., Ltd. et al
as 2:2018cv12459
Defendant:
Aisan Corporation of America, Aisan Industry Co., Ltd., Hyundam Industrial Co., Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
California, State of
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Geico Corporation v. Aisan Industry Co., Ltd. et al
as 2:2018cv12210
Defendant:
Koito Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Stanley Electric U.S. Co., Inc., Eberspacher North America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
GEICO County Mutual Insurance Company, GEICO Secure Insurance Company, GEICO Choice Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Group 1 Automotive, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Group 1 Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships et al v. Aisan Industry Company, Limited et al
as 2:2017cv12013
Plaintiff:
Group 1 Automotive, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Group 1 Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships , Asbury Automotive Group, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Asbury Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships , Van Tuyl Group, LLC, as Assignee on Behalf of Assignor Dealerships and others
Defendant:
Aisan Industry Company, Limited, Franklin Precision Industry, Incorporated, Aisan Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
