Cases 1 - 10 of 698
Vanderpool et al v. Harry et al
as 1:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
Roxie Vanderpool, Rickie Vanderpool, Allie Vanderpool and others
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, Gregory Davis, Peter Derieux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BRETZIK v. KOVALCHIK et al
as 5:2024cv01452
Plaintiff:
GERALD ROBERT BRETZIK
Defendant:
JOSEPH KOVALCHIK, JAMES CHUSS, MICHAEL BAIRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cator v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00643
Plaintiff:
Frantz Cator
Defendant:
Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frantz (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv00799
Petitioner:
James E. Frantz
Respondent:
Andre Stancil and Phil Weiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frantz v. State of Kansas, et al
as 24-3032
Plaintiff:
BARBARA FRANTZ
Defendant:
STATE OF KANSAS, JEFF ZMUDA, Secretary of Corrections, GLORIA GEITHER, Warden, Topeka correctional facility and others
Martin et al v. Shelby Transport, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Stacey Lynne Martin and Daniel Joe Martin
Defendant:
Shelby Transport, Inc. and James Roy Frantz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Mullins v. Novatech et al
as 1:2024cv00824
Plaintiff:
Avis Mullins
Defendant:
INC NOVATECH, CYNTHIA PETION, EDDY PETION and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Frantz v. Standard Insurance Company
as 0:2024cv60067
Plaintiff:
Joseph Frantz
Defendant:
Standard Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv23329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
