Cases 1 - 10 of 808
Bowman et al v Ingersoll-Rand Industrial U.S. Inc
as 3:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
DALLAS BOWMAN, THOMAS DAVIES, FRED FURLANO, SR. and others
Defendant:
INGERSOLL-RAND INDUSTRIAL U.S., INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Davenport, Fred v. Steingraeber, Brooke et al
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Fred Lee Davenport
Defendant:
Brooke Steingraeber, Kyle Ferstl, Jane Doe 1 and others
Not Yet Classified:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prewitt v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02492
Plaintiff:
Fred Prewitt
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., Softsheen-Carson LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davenport, Fred v. Marczewski, Ethan et al
as 3:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Fred Lee Davenport
Defendant:
Lieutenant Ethan Marczewski, Ryan Blount, Larry Fuchs and others
Not Yet Classified:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davenport, Fred v. Frstle, Kyle et al
as 3:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Fred Lee Davenport
Defendant:
Kyle Frstle, Joshua Hien and Matthew Wally Yung
Not Yet Classified:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Justin Rumler v. Branden Myers, et al
as 24-1342
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN L. RUMLER
Defendant:
BRANDEN MYERS, Lt, of RHU/I.D.O.C., in their official and individual capacities, NICOLE WELLS, Sgt., of RHU I.D.O.C., in their official and individual capacities and FRED MOORE, Sgt of RHU/MCF/IDOC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Davenport v. Wallyung et al
as 2:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Fred Lee Davenport
Defendant:
Matthew Wallyung, Kobe Culpitt, Jacob Curiell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
