Cases 1 - 10 of 229
Bowman et al v Ingersoll-Rand Industrial U.S. Inc
as 3:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
DALLAS BOWMAN, THOMAS DAVIES, FRED FURLANO, SR. and others
Defendant:
INGERSOLL-RAND INDUSTRIAL U.S., INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PETERS v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv02135
Plaintiff:
FRED PETERS
Defendant:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Finnegan v. Tetzloff et al
as 3:2023cv00738
Defendant:
Jeniffer Tetzloff, Jeniff Tetzloff, Kim Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Grant Finnegan
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Repasky v. Otis Elevator Company et al
as 3:2023cv00635
Plaintiff:
Amanda Repasky
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company and Fred Stickovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Giveans v. KZRV, LP
as 3:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
Fred Giveans
Defendant:
KZRV, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
PETERS v. WARDEN -- I.Y.C.
as 1:2023cv00611
Plaintiff:
FRED PETERS
Defendant:
WARDEN -- I.Y.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silich v. Obermiller et al
as 2:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DAVID SILICH
Defendant:
BRANDON OBERMILLER, JAMES WESLEY, III RICHARDSON, JOSEPH D CLEMMONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peters v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00973
Petitioner:
Fred Peters
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00968
Plaintiff:
Fred L. Bell
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
