Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Shaw v. Dewey et al
as 2:2024cv02197
Plaintiff:
Tekeva Shaw
Defendant:
Robin Dewey, Makayla Powell, Toriance White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Trivedi et al v. Minor et al
as 4:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Harshal Trivedi, Gayatri Trivedi and Dilip Trivedi
Defendant:
Trey Minor, Jacob Campbell, Tull Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Van Over v. AKHLAGHI et al
as 3:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Barry Van Over
Defendant:
MOHAMMAD AKHLAGHI, PAMCHAL SAYYAD, NEXTGEN MMA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Bobo v. Bowers et al
as 2:2023cv02498
Petitioner:
Travis D. Bobo
Respondent:
Freddie Bowers, C. Peters, T. D. Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rivera et al v. Williams
as 2:2023cv02067
Plaintiff:
Hilda Rivera and Hector Reyes
Defendant:
Freddie Lee Williams, Jr.
Not Classified By Court:
Jamita Swearengen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
