Cases 1 - 10 of 164
Thompson v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00994
Plaintiff:
Frederick A. Thompson
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Saunders v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
Frederick Saunders
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rozo v. EssilorLuxottica S.A. et al
as 0:2023cv03822
Plaintiff:
Frederick Rozo
Defendant:
EssilorLuxottica S.A., Luxottica Group S.p.A., Essilor International SAS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Smith v. Radius Global Solutions, LLC
as 0:2023cv03182
Plaintiff:
Frederick Smith
Defendant:
Radius Global Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Abrego et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02818
Plaintiff:
Joseph Abrego, Antonio Aguilar, Jose R Aguilera and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Kashaua et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02738
Plaintiff:
Edmund Kashaua, Amos Kashumba, Denis Kashumbusha and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Abaho et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02743
Plaintiff:
Fenekansi Abaho, Vitson Abaasa, Nathan Abaho and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Hines v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv02692
Plaintiff:
Frederick Dewayne Hines
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, County of Washington, City of Stillwater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hines v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv02251
Plaintiff:
Frederick Dewayne Hines
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Adams, Evitch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibbons v. Bjorkland et al
as 0:2023cv01508
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Gibbons
Defendant:
Ethan C. Bjorkland, Melinda Erwin, John Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
