Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Peters v. Ricco-Sheriff Dept Employee et al
as 7:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Marc Arron Peters
Defendant:
Ricco-Sheriff Dept Employee, Seitz Jr, FNU Cameron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hope v. Smith et al
as 9:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Russell Hope, Jr
Defendant:
Jason Smith, FNU Vincent, Christopher Lockwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jung-Peters v. Bagley et al
as 7:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Marc Arron Jung-Peters
Defendant:
Ben Bagley, Akacia Teague, Vera Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lumsden et al v. Collier et al
as 6:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Lumsden, Norman Horton, Benjamin Benson and others
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, C.F. Hazelwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. Johnston et al
as 7:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Marc Arron Peters
Defendant:
Bob Johnston, Matt Frost, Jonathan Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Capital One Bank et al
as 4:2022cv01752
Plaintiff:
Dimitric A. Knight
Defendant:
Capital One Bank, Frost Bank and Sportman Motel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. John Doe
as 7:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Marc Arron Peters
Defendant:
John Doe (7:22-CV-48-O), Bob Johnston, Sheriff Dept Employees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frost v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv01248
Plaintiff:
Marc A. Frost, Jr.
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Trochesset et al
as 3:2021cv00054
Defendant:
Haley Sloss, Hon. Patricia Grady, Jack Roady and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Frost
as 7:2019cv00088
Defendant:
Pam Frost
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
