Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Frost v. Davenport et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Jared Dakota Frost
Defendant:
Jennifer Davenport, Byron Oliver, Alan Smitherman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchem v. Frost et al
as 5:2021cv01103
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Scott Mitchem
Defendant:
William R Frost and Jonathan S Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frost v. Carter et al
as 5:2020cv00864
Defendant:
Russell Eason, Lee Carter and Winston County Circuit Court
Plaintiff:
David Scott Frost
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frost v. Moore et al
as 6:2020cv00517
Plaintiff:
David Scott Frost
Defendant:
James Wittman and Hoyt Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frost v. Winston County Alabama Jail & Court System
as 6:2019cv01319
Defendant:
Winston County Alabama Jail & Court System, Warden and Sheriff Tommy Moore
Plaintiff:
David Scott Frost
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frost v. Jones et al
as 2:2015cv00418
Petitioner:
Robert Eugene Frost
Respondent:
Kenneth Jones, Rene Mason and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Douglas v. Carter et al
as 6:2014cv02475
Plaintiff:
Roderick Douglas
Defendant:
Betina Carter, Carroll, Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frost v. Estes et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2013cv00752
Plaintiff:
Harold Clarence Frost
Defendant:
Dewayne Estes and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abbott v. Bray et al
as 5:2013cv00175
Plaintiff:
Arnold Andrews Abbott
Defendant:
Phillip E Bray, Randy L Frost and C Wilson Blaylock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Elmore County District Attorney et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00041
Plaintiff:
Willie James Harris, Jr.
Defendant:
Elmore County District Attorney, Elmore County District Court, Elmore County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
