Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Norris et al v. Norris et al
as 1:2009cv02502
Plaintiff:
Robert (I) C. Norris, Robert C. Norris, Jane W. Norris and others
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., Merrill Lynch Trust Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv03104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
United States of America v. Armour et al
as 3:2009cv01774
Defendant:
Thomas D. Armour, III and Frost National Bank, NA
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
The Frost National Bank v. M/V FREEMONT
as 4:2009cv02915
Plaintiff:
The Frost National Bank
Defendant:
M/V FREEMONT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
The Frost National Bank v. M/V CLARA ANN
as 4:2009cv02914
Plaintiff:
The Frost National Bank
Defendant:
M/V CLARA ANN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
v. Frost National Bank
as 4:2009cv02891
Defendant:
Frost National Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Frost National Bank v. M/V CLARA ANN et al
as 4:2009cv02892
Plaintiff:
Frost National Bank
Defendant:
M/V CLARA ANN and M/V FREEMONT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Frost National Bank v. Southern C's, Inc.
as 4:2009cv02557
Plaintiff:
Frost National Bank
Defendant:
Southern C's, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
The Frost National Bank v. Howard
as 4:2009mc00333
Plaintiff:
The Frost National Bank
Defendant:
Thomas E. Howard, Jr.
Ningbo FTZ Sanbang v. Frost National Bank
as 09-50063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NINGBO FTZ SANBANG INDUSTRY CO LTD, 62 Changfeng Industrial Zone, Zhonggongmiao Town, Yinzhou District, Ningbo, Peoples Republic of China
Defendant - Appellee:
FROST NATIONAL BANK, Care of Mr Stan McCormick, Registered Agent, 100 W Houston Street, San Antonio, Texas 78205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
