Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Fulco v. Carson et al
as 4:2026cv00180
Plaintiff:
George W. Fulco
Defendant:
Sergeant Chris Carson, Sergeant Carissa Welch, Fnu Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fulco v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2025cv01430
Petitioner:
George W. Fulco
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fulco v. Carson et al
as 3:2025cv03433
Plaintiff:
George W Fulco
Defendant:
Chris Carson, Carissa Welch, FNU Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fulco v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2025cv03133
Petitioner:
George W Fulco
Respondent:
State of Texas, Kaufman Sheriffs Department and Mary Bardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Fulco v. Kaufman County
as 3:2025cv02951
Respondent:
Kaufman County
Petitioner:
George W Fulco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Fulco v. State of Texas et al
as 4:2025cv01185
Plaintiff:
George W. Fulco
Defendant:
State of Texas, Judge Jim Fallon, Eli Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fulco v. Grayson County Sheriff Department
as 4:2024cv01107
Respondent:
Grayson County Sheriff Department
Defendant:
George W. Fulco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fulco v. Kaufman Co Sheriff's Dept et al
as 3:2024cv03076
Defendant:
Kaufman Co Sheriff's Dept and FNU Garza
Plaintiff:
George W Fulco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fulco v. Hampton
as 4:2024cv01025
Defendant:
George W. Fulco and Ginny Hampton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fulco v. Kaufman Co. Sheriff's Dept., et al.
as 4:2024cv01007
Defendant:
Deputy Sheriff Garza and Kaufman Co. Sheriff's Dept.
Plaintiff:
George W. Fulco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
