Cases 31 - 40 of 100
Ballard v. Fulton County Sheriff's Office
as 1:2021cv01285
Plaintiff:
Duane P Ballard
Defendant:
Fulton County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacobson v. NaphCare Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03632
Plaintiff:
David Otto Jacobson
Defendant:
Naph Care Inc., Medical Director at Fulton County Jail, John Does (I-III) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNELLING v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2021cv00205
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J SNELLING, JR
Defendant:
ERIC ALLS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, FULTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plunkett v. Fulton County Sheriff et al
as 1:2021cv01863
Defendant:
Jail Medical Staff Does, Jail Dental Staff Does, Chief Jailer Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Christopher Plunkett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santry v. Fulton County Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv01374
Defendant:
Robb Pitts, Bozich, Naphcare and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Shawn Santry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00687
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr
Wood v. Fulton County Sheriff et al
as 1:2021cv00316
Petitioner:
Roosevelt Allen Wood
Respondent:
Fulton County Sheriff and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Roland v. Fulton County Sheriff et al
as 1:2021cv00315
Petitioner:
Albert Roland
Respondent:
Fulton County Sheriff and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SNELLING v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2020cv00433
Defendant:
DR BRADFORD ROBERT, SERGEANT DILLHUNT, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J SNELLING, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNELLING v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2020cv00383
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J SNELLING, JR
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER ERIC ALLS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHNSON STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
