Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Pennsylvania State Conference of NAACP Branches, et al v. Northampton County Board of Elections, et al
as 23-3166
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE CONFERENCE OF NAACP BRANCHES, LEAGUE OF WOMAN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA, PHILADELPHIANS ORGANIZED TO WITNESS EMPOWER AND REBUILD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, SECRETARY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ADAMS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Not Yet Classified:
RICHARD MARINO, DEMOCRATIC SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE, DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE and REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA
Appellant:
STATE OF ALABAMA, BRYAN CUTLER, KIM WARD and others
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellee:
THE PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT and SENIORLAW CENTER
PENNSYLVANIA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP et al v. CHAPMAN et al
as 1:2022cv00339
Plaintiff:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA, PHILADELPHIANS ORGANIZED TO WITNESS and others
Defendant:
LEIGH M. CHAPMAN, ADAMS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ALLEGHENY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Intervenor:
DAVID BALL, JAMES D. BEE, DEBRA BIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DEANGELO v. LVNV FUNDING LLC et al
as 1:2018cv15689
Defendant:
Sherman Financial Group LLC, LVNV FUNDING LLC, ALEGIS GROUP LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DEANGELO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
GUTIERREZ v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv38163
Plaintiff:
MAURO G. GUTIERREZ
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
GUTIERREZ v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv32335
Plaintiff:
MAURO G. GUTIERREZ
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
