Cases 21 - 30 of 32
ROH v. SHULTZ et al
as 1:2021cv02560
Plaintiff:
BM3 JOSHUA DILLON ROH and JOSHUA DILLON ROH
Defendant:
Admiral KARL L. SHULTZ, Rear Admiral JOANNA NUNAN, Rear Admiral WILLIAM G KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Vester Johnson v. T. Townsend, et al
as 19-31031
Defendant / Appellee:
T. TAYLOR TOWNSEND and DONALD G. KELLY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VESTER JOHNSON
CISNEROS v. NOVAN, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv01066
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO CISNEROS
Defendant:
NOVAN, INC. , NATHAN STASKO , RICHARD D. PETERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
STEFANOWICZ v. NOVAN, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv01015
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW STEFANOWICZ
Defendant:
NOVAN, INC. , NATHAN STASKO , RICHARD D. PETERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
MIRIYALA v. NOVAN, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00999
Plaintiff:
VICTOR MIRIYALA
Defendant:
NOVAN, INC. , NATHAN STASKO , RICHARD D. PETERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Maryanow v. Fitzgerald et al
as 7:2014cv07438
Plaintiff:
Joseph Maryanow
Defendant:
Carol L. Fitzgerald, Joseph S. Santana, Peter G. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Philco Investments, Ltd., et al v. G. Martin, et al
as 11-17709
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILCO INVESTMENTS, LTD., DAVID MAUER, DAVID ROSENBAUM and others
Defendant - Appellee:
G. KELLY MARTIN, LARS EKMAN, SHANE COOKE and others
Philco Investments, LTD et al v. Martin et al
as 3:2010cv02785
Plaintiff:
Philco Investments, LTD , David Mauer , David Rosenbaum and others
Defendant:
G. Kelly Martin , Lars Ekman , Shane Cooke and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Philco Investments, LTD et al v. Martin et al
as 4:2010cv02785
Plaintiff:
Philco Investments, LTD , David Mauer , David Rosenbaum and others
Defendant:
G. Kelly Martin, Lars Ekman, Shane Cooke and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Rita G. Kelly, et al. v. Celotex Corporation
as PAE/2:86-CV-05862
Defendant:
Celotex Corporation
Plaintiff:
Rita G. Kelly
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
