Cases 1 - 10 of 12
MARTIN v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2016cv03449
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MARTIN
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY , NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , ANTONIO CAMPUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2012cv30025
Plaintiff:
GIDEON G LEWIS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LEWIS v. KEYSTONE SHIPPING COMPANY
as 5:2011cv54099
Plaintiff:
GIDEON G. LEWIS
Defendant:
KEYSTONE SHIPPING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LEWIS v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv54845
Plaintiff:
GIDEON G LEWIS
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LEWIS v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 5:2011cv54315
Plaintiff:
GIDEON G. LEWIS
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LEWIS et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
as 2:2011cv65203
Plaintiff:
LUTHER S LEWIS and JUIANITA G LEWIS
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chandan Vora v. Ronald Fisher, et al
as 10-1676
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHANDAN S. VORA
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD FISHER, COURIER EXPRESS, WESTCO INS and others
VORA v. FISHER et al
as 3:2009cv00283
Plaintiff:
CHANDAN S. VORA
Defendant:
RONALD FISHER, COURIER EXPRESS, WESTCO INS. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
LEWIS et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv69224
Plaintiff:
JESSE G. LEWIS and ANNIE L. LEWIS
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Lampkin et al v. Lassiter et al
as 2:2007cv68978
Plaintiff:
Jimmy D. Lampkin, Cecelia Lampkin, Gerald Landreth and others
Defendant:
Ernest L. Lassiter, WILLIAM H. LEE and Betty Lemons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
