Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Richard v. Fischer
as 24-793
Defendant: Ms. DIGNEAN, Senior Correctional Counselor, Five Points Correctional Facility, THOMAS TANEA, Senior Correctional Counselor, Five Points Correctional Facility, ANTHONY ANNUCCI, Deputy Commissioner and Counsel of DOCCS and others
Plaintiff: JOHN WILLIS RICHARD
Chrysler v. Guiney We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1485
Petitioner - Appellant: Gregory Chrysler
Respondent - Appellee: G. Guiney, Acting Superintendent Five Points Correctional Facility
Richard v. Fischer et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2011cv06013
Plaintiff: John Willis Richard
Defendant: Anthony Annucci, Karen Bellamy, Ms. Dignean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard v. Fischer et al
as 9:2010cv01460
Plaintiff: John Willis Richard
Defendant: Anthony Annucci, Karen Bellamy, Ms. Digrean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Central Office Review
as 10-3073
Plaintiff - Appellant: Shawn Green
Defendant - Appellee: Thomas G. Eagen, K. Bellamy, Kenneth McLaughlin and others
Meehan v. Pataki et al
as 1:2008cv10661
Plaintiff: Dennis Meehan
Defendant: George Pataki, Glen Goord, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chrysler v. Guiney We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2007cv08474
Petitioner: Gregory Chrysler
Respondent: G. Guiney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chrysler v. Guiney
as 1:2007cv08474
Petitioner: Gregory Chrysler
Respondent: G. Guiney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chrysler v. Guiney
as 1:2007cv00522
Petitioner: Gregory Chrysler
Respondent: G. Guiney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Central Office Review Committee et al
as 1:2007cv04536
Plaintiff: Shawn Green
Defendant: Central Office Review Committee, Thomas G. Eagen, K. Bellamy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?