Cases filed in Virginia
Ralph v. Brinkley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00725
Defendant: G.M. Brinkley, D. Gill and P. Pingree
Plaintiff: Antonio Ralph, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00332
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
United States for the use and benefit of G.M. Clements, Incorporated et al v. Alutiiq International Solutions, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00823
Plaintiff: United States for the use and benefit of G.M. Clements, Incorporated and G.M. Clements, Incorporated
Defendant: Alutiiq International Solutions, Inc. and Safeco Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Type: Contract Miller Act
In the Matter of the Complaint of McAllister Towing of Virginia, Inc. as Owner of the Tug G.M. McAllister
as 2:2010cv00541
Plaintiff: In the Matter of the Complaint of McAllister Towing of Virginia, Inc. as Owner of the Tug G.M. MCALLISTER
Defendant: None Listed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Robinson v. Hinkle
as 1:2010cv00550
Plaintiff: Marvin Gaye Robinson
Defendant: G.M. Hinkle, T Mills, Hitch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutton v. Va. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2007cv00500
Plaintiff: Troy Sutton
Defendant: Va. Department of Corrections, VDOC's Director G.M. Johnson, Inspector Gen. June W. Kimbriel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephenson v. Hinkle
as 2:2007cv00400
Petitioner: Mack Stephenson
Respondent: Warden G.M. Hinkle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stone v. Hinkle
as 2:2007cv00182
Petitioner: Phillip A. Stone
Respondent: Warden G.M. Hinkle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?