Cases 1 - 10 of 15
BOYD v. JACKSON ST et al
as 5:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS MARQUES BOYD and DAVIOUS MARQUEZ BOYD
Defendant:
JACKSON ST, GA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MACON STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Jackson St. et al
as 1:2023cv02574
Plaintiff:
Davious Marques Boyd
Defendant:
Jackson St., GA Department of Corrections, Macon State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUNTER v. LAWSON et al
as 5:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
JOHN A HUNTER
Defendant:
MALISA LAWSON and GA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barry Gibson v. Aimee Smith, et al
as 22-14222
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARRY LYNN GIBSON
Defendant / Appellee:
AIMEE SMITH, Dooly State Prison, MELBA CHANEY, Warden of Care and Treatment, Dooly State Prison, KENDRICK, Optometrist, GA Department of Corrections Contractor and others
Clay v. GA Department of Corrections
as 1:2020cv03342
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Clay
Defendant:
GA Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv05062
Defendant:
James D. Smith, The State of Georgia, Commissioner, State Chaplain, Ga. Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
David Timothy Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVERA v. CENTRAL STATE PRISON GA et al
as 5:2019cv00286
Defendant:
MANAGER WILSON, GA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CENTRAL STATE PRISON GA and others
Plaintiff:
ROLANDO GUERRA RIVERA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. GA Department of Corrections
as 1:2016cv00982
Petitioner:
Robert E. Lee
Respondent:
GA Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Harper v. GA Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv03312
Plaintiff:
James Shivers Harper
Defendant:
GA Department of Corrections, Brian Owens, Rhonda Billings and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
