Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Jay Waller v. Michael Burgess, et al
as 24-1222
Plaintiff:
JAY ANTHONY WALLER
Defendant:
WARDEN MICHAEL BURGESS, Personal capacity, THOMAS PARISH, Former Warden personal capacity, DEPUTY WARDEN JEFFREY CLOUSE, Personal Capacity and others
Luis Espinoza-Anguiano v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3219
Petitioner:
LUIS GABRIEL ESPINOZA-ANGUIANO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Gabriel Kaimowitz v. Michigan Bar, et al
as 24-1157
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL HILLEL KAIMOWITZ
Defendant:
MICHIGAN BAR, FLORIDA BAR, JOHN T. BERRY and others
James SmithIn re: James Smith
as 24-1103
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES GABRIEL SMITH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Christopher Smith v. David Dawdy, et al
as 23-2043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER CARSON SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID DAWDY, Corrections Mental Health Program Director, official and personal capacity, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, MDOC Director, official capacity, GREG JOHNSON, Corrections Mental Health Program Involuntary Treatment, personal capacity and others
USA v. James Smith
as 23-1546
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES GABRIEL SMITH
Andrew Smigelski v. Gregg Cluley, et al
as 23-3322
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW SMIGELSKI
Defendant / Appellee:
GREGG CLULEY, Logan Police Detective, JOSH MOWERY, Former Logan Police Officer, RYAN GABRIEL, Logan Police Captain and others
Brian Adams, et al v. 3M Company
as 23-5232
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BRIAN ADAMS, ALICE ADAMS, EDWARD ADAMS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M COMPANY, fka Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company
Defendant:
MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES, et al.
Amicus Curiae:
U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
In re: Razvan Pop, et al
as 23-101
Petitioner:
In re: RAZVAN S. POP, MARIA POP and R.S.P EXPRESS, INC.
Not Classified By Court:
NA TRUCK REPAIR, LLC
Respondent:
MIRELA USELMANN, dba Sapphire Trucking, Inc., GABRIEL BICLEA, dba MB Trucking, Inc., ION GUTU, dba GPA Trucking, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
