Cases 31 - 40 of 189
Sochor v. Bradshaw et al
as 4:2022cv00160
Petitioner:
John Gabriel Sochor
Respondent:
Kenneth Bradshaw and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sochor v. Unknown Party et al
as 4:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Sochor
Defendant:
Unknown Party, Unknown Clark, Unknown Kohls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sochor v. Bradshaw et al
as 4:2021cv00543
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Sochor
Defendant:
Kenneth Bradshaw, Ariel Monge, Unknown Heisner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valdez #275108 v. Shinn et al
as 3:2021cv08269
Plaintiff:
Ysidro Juan Valdez
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Hennry, Vanessa Headstream and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Macias v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv02094
Petitioner:
Gabriel Macias
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cortez-Gastelum #178673 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv01862
Plaintiff:
Fabian Cortez-Gastelum
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, David Shinn, Lori Stickley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murillo v. United States Department of Justice
as 4:2021cv00425
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Murillo
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sochor v. Bradshaw et al
as 4:2021cv00394
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Sochor
Defendant:
Kenneth Bradshaw, Ariel Monge, Unknown Heisner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ochoa v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv01672
Plaintiff:
Francisco Gabriel Ochoa, Sr and Francisco Gabriel Ochoa, Sr.
Defendant:
United States of America and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
