Cases 31 - 40 of 79
COX v. CARNEY et al
as 1:2019cv00866
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM COX
Defendant:
SUPERVISORS AND OTHER CASE MANAGERS and GABRIEL CARNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00213
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00844
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03089
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
IMO 2018 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 1:2018mc00026
In Re:
Lauren Kathleen Griffin, Michael John Bellich, Thomas William Belleperche and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES LLC v. CAMPBELL
as 1:2018cv01854
Defendant:
GABRIEL M. CAMPBELL
Plaintiff:
J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
as 1:2018mc00038
Respondent:
ANDREW JOHN ALBRIGHT, MICHAEL EUGENE ALLEN, MANISH SHAILESHKUMAR ANTANI and others
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Zapata v. United States of America
as 2:2017cv00475
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Zapata
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
SPARROW v. USUBOV et al
as 2:2017cv00563
Defendant:
DAG05REG, INC. and GABRIEL USUBOV
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW SPARROW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
