Cases 21 - 30 of 85
Dennis v. Jones et al
as 5:2019cv00072
Defendant:
Tracey Arbuthnot, J. Jones, Gabriel Walker and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Darius Dennis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDowell v. Errington
as 1:2019cv00282
Plaintiff:
Gabriel McDowell
Defendant:
Joe Errington
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Powell v. Shaw et al
as 3:2019cv00023
Defendant:
Mary Ann Jones, Charlis Dukes, Ruth Saucier and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Vanslye v. Walker et al
as 5:2018cv00140
Defendant:
Management and Training Corporation and Warden Gabriel Walker
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Jacob Heath VanSlyke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinkston v. Hall et al
as 5:2018cv00103
Defendant:
Larry Lee, Jerry Williams, C/O C. Hughey and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Chaz D. Pinkston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Management Training Corporation (M-T-C) et al
as 5:2018cv00091
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Sean K. Smith, Pelicia Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Levonzel Anderson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roscoe v. Bradley et al
as 5:2018cv00059
Plaintiff:
Denaricus Antone Roscoe
Defendant:
Jody Bradley, Gabriel Walker and Management Training Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. Bradley et al
as 5:2018cv00038
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Haynes
Defendant:
Jodi Bradley, Gabriel Walker, Toomey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McMullen v. Walker et al
as 5:2017cv00152
Plaintiff:
Steve Brian McMullen, Jr.
Defendant:
Dianne Walker, Gabriel Walker, Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellender v. Hall et al
as 5:2017cv00144
Plaintiff:
Barry James Ellender
Defendant:
Pelicia Hall, James Bradley, Gabriel Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
