Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Murry v. Caughron et al
as 4:2024cv05019
Plaintiff:
Roy Howard Murry
Defendant:
Desaraye Caughron, Derek Anderson, Gabriel Lapsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Valdez v. Gerera
as 4:2023cv05105
Petitioner:
Gabriel Valdez
Respondent:
Cheefe Rob Gerera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Valdez v. Roehm et al.
as 4:2023cv05102
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Valdez
Defendant:
Brittnie E Roehm, Eric Eisinger, Brad Conn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acosta et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2023cv03068
Plaintiff:
Nicole Acosta, Gabriel Acosta, Marilena Acosta and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Inc, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bennett v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv05058
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Bennett
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Resendez v. Andrewjeski
as 2:2023cv00089
Petitioner:
Gabriel A Resendez
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gamez v. Greystar Real Estate Partners LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Gamez
Defendant:
Greystar Real Estate Partners LLC, Twelve 925 East Mansfield Owner III LLC, Bob Faith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Rodarte v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv03180
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Rodarte
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
