Cases 1 - 10 of 76
United States of America v. Alexis
as 5:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Isaac Gabriel Alexis
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Ravenscroft, Jr. v. Morrisey et al
as 5:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Ravenscroft, Jr.
Defendant:
Patrick Morrisey, Office of the Attorney General, Perry J. DeChristopher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kitchens v. Limitless PCS, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Gabrielle A. Kitchens and Gabrielle A. Kitchen
Defendant:
Limitless PCS, Inc. and James Redman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Harris v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00153
Petitioner:
Gabriel Dequan Harris
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bailey v. Robinson et al
as 2:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Faithe Bailey and Gabriel Claxton
Defendant:
Charles Robinson and M. L. Joseph Sand & Gravel Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Opata v. Rokosky
as 1:2022cv00572
Petitioner:
Gabriel Ateh Opata
Respondent:
Eric Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Stewart v. Mucciola et al
as 5:2022cv00238
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Stewart
Defendant:
Gabrielle E. Mucciola, Judge Tucker, Morgantown WV Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Canterbury et al
as 1:2021cv00469
Plaintiff:
Amos Gabriel Hicks
Defendant:
Steven D. Canterbury, Booker T. Stephens, Francine Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Ames
as 2:2020cv00665
Petitioner:
Amos Gabriel Hicks
Respondent:
Superintendent Donald Ames
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hicks v. Ames
as 1:2020cv00665
Petitioner:
Amos Gabriel Hicks
Respondent:
Superintendent Donald Ames
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
