Cases 1 - 10 of 24
VASQUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv21215
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL VASQUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vasquez Perez v. Al Golden Lion Deli Corp et al
as 1:2022cv07974
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Vasquez Perez
Defendant:
Al Golden Lion Deli Corp and Jamil AlMaroosh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
VASQUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv94729
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VASQUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv89164
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARCOS GABRIEL VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VASQUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv29445
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VASQUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv14832
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
HERNAN GABRIEL VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VASQUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv01681
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NESSMITH et al v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv03077
Plaintiff:
JAMES BOWLES, ALLAN EUROZA, DANIEL YOON and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nessmith et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02081
Plaintiff:
James Bowles, Allan Euroza, Daniel Yoon and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00178
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
