Cases
Olagues v. Dickerson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv04800
Plaintiff: John Olagues
Defendant: Gary Dickerson and Applied Materials Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
In re: Fresenius Granuflo/Natu
as 15-1212
Plaintiff - Appellee: CLARENCE L. DUBOSE, individually and as Personal Representative of the estate of Clarence Lee Dubose, BETTYE B. ALEXANDER, AUSTIN P. JETER and others
Plaintiff: KIRK M. PRATT, EOLINE L. STOUDAMIRE, LINDA MCDOWELL and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: STATE OF LOUISIANA, ex rel. James D. "Buddy" Caldwell, Attorney General
Defendant - Appellee: FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE NORTH AMERICA, INC., FRESENIUS USA, INC., FRESENIUS USA MARKETING, INC. and others
Defendant: WALTER L. WEISMAN
In re: Fresenius Granuflo/Natu
as 15-1212
Plaintiff / Appellee: CLARENCE L. DUBOSE, individually and as Personal Representative of the estate of Clarence Lee Dubose, BETTYE B. ALEXANDER, AUSTIN P. JETER and others
Plaintiff: KIRK M. PRATT, EOLINE L. STOUDAMIRE, LINDA MCDOWELL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF LOUISIANA, ex rel. James D. "Buddy" Caldwell, Attorney General
Defendant / Appellee: FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE NORTH AMERICA, INC., FRESENIUS USA, INC., FRESENIUS USA MARKETING, INC. and others
Defendant: WALTER L. WEISMAN
In re: Fresenius Granuflo/Natu
as 15-1211
Plaintiff - Appellee: CLARENCE L. DUBOSE, individually and as Personal Representative of the estate of Clarence Lee Dubose, BETTYE B. ALEXANDER, AUSTIN P. JETER and others
Plaintiff: KIRK M. PRATT, EOLINE L. STOUDAMIRE, LINDA MCDOWELL and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: JIM HOOD, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, ex rel. The State of Mississippi
Defendant - Appellee: FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE NORTH AMERICA, INC., FRESENIUS USA, INC., FRESENIUS USA MARKETING, INC. and others
Defendant: WALTER L. WEISMAN
Dickerson et al v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 1:2011cv00205
Plaintiff: Diane Dickerson and The Estate of Gary Dickerson
Defendant: Eli Lilly and Company, AAI Pharma Services Corp., Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
The Special Litigation Committ v. USDCSJ
as 09-70324
: In re: KLA-TENCOR CORP. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
Petitioner: THE SPECIAL LITIGATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF NOMINAL DEFENDANT KLA-TENCOR CORPORATION
Respondent: USDC, SAN JOSE
Real Party In Interest: JAMES ZIOLKOWSKI, MARK ZIERING, RICHARD WALLACE and others
Alaska Electrical Pension Plan, et al v. The Special Litigation Committ, et al
as 09-15155
Not Classified By Court: In re: KLA-TENCOR CORP. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: ALASKA ELECTRICAL PENSION FUND, Lead Plaintiff
Plaintiff: JAMES ZIOLKOWSKI, JEFFREY A. RABIN, MARK ZIERING and others
Defendant / Appellant: THE SPECIAL LITIGATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF NOMINAL DEFENDANT KLA-TENCOR CORPORATION
Defendant: NOMINAL DEFENDANT KLA-TENCOR CORPORATION, RICHARD WALLACE, JOHN KISPERT and others
Alaska Electrical Pension Plan, et al v. The Special Litigation Committ, et al
as 09-15155
: In re: KLA-TENCOR CORP. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: ALASKA ELECTRICAL PENSION FUND, Lead Plaintiff
Plaintiff: JAMES ZIOLKOWSKI, JEFFREY A. RABIN, MARK ZIERING and others
Defendant - Appellant: THE SPECIAL LITIGATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF NOMINAL DEFENDANT KLA-TENCOR CORPORATION
Defendant: NOMINAL DEFENDANT KLA-TENCOR CORPORATION, RICHARD WALLACE, JOHN KISPERT and others
In re KLA-Tencor Corp., Shareholder Derivative Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2006cv03445
Plaintiff: James Ziolkowski, Jeffrey A Rabin, City of Philadelphia Board of Pensions and Retirement and others
Defendant: Kenneth Levy, Kenneth Schroeder, Jon Tompkins and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Special Litigation Committee of the Board of Directors of KLA-Tencor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?