Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00380
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00542
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-4299
Debtor - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01782
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Fifth Third Bank v. Reinert, et al
as 1:2011cv00723
Plaintiff:
Fifth Third Bank
Defendant:
Gary L Reinert, Sr., John and John Does 1-100, John Doe Corporations 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fifth Third Ban v. Gary L Reinert, Sr.
as 2:2011ms00008
Plaintiff:
Fifth Third Bank
Defendant:
Gary L Reinert, Sr.
Capital Produce Inc. v. G&R Acquisition, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03561
Defendant:
G&R Acquisition, Inc., Prismm of Arundel Mills, LLC , Pris-mm of Crofton, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Capital Produce, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
FIFTH THIRD BANK v. REINERT
as 2:2010mc00353
Plaintiff:
FIFTH THIRD BANK
Defendant:
GARY L. REINERT, SR.
Receiver:
ROBERT NOEL
REINERT et al v. MAX & ERMA'S RESTAURANT, INC.
as 2:2010mc00225
Appellant:
GARY L. REINERT, SR. and G&R ACQUISTION, INC.
Appellee:
MAX & ERMA'S RESTAURANT, INC.
POWER CONTRACTING, INC. et al v. STIRLING ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv00970
Plaintiff:
POWER CONTRACTING, INC., ROAD RUNNER PLANNING AND CONSULTING, INC., GARY L. REINERT, SR. and others
Defendant:
STIRLING ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC., SES SOLAR TWO, LLC and SCHUFF CONTRACTING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
