Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
SMITH v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2018cv01083
Plaintiff:
DARRYL SMITH
Defendant:
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA , GAUDENZIA DRC, INC. and GUADENZIA DRC, INC. SHORT AND LONG TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
CRUZ v. MOORE SMEAL et al
as 2:2016cv05789
Plaintiff:
HECTOR PAUL CRUZ
Defendant:
MS. SHIRLEY R. MOORE SMEAL, DANIEL D. MCINTYRE, SUPV. OFFICE OF SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS & INTELLIGENCE, GAUDENZIA, DRC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRAZIER v. BURGESS et al
as 2:2015cv05163
Plaintiff:
JAMES FRAZIER
Defendant:
WILLETTE BURGESS, GAUDENZIA-DRC, INC. and TERESA SHARPE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BUSTER v. GAUDENZIA DRC, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv03515
Plaintiff:
RICKY BUSTER
Defendant:
GAUDENZIA DRC, INC., PAT O'CONNER, BARBARA SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASTILLO v. BEZPALKO et al
as 2:2013cv02521
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D. CASTILLO
Defendant:
DANIEL BEZPALKO, BRUCE F. MAYS, GAUDENZIA DRC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ESCOBAR v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2012cv06739
Defendant:
SHARRONNA HOLMES, MR. JOHN E. WETZEL, COUNSELOR MARY and others
Plaintiff:
IVAN ESCOBAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
