Cases 1 - 10 of 20
YOUNG v. ACLU et al
as 2:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
MARION L. YOUNG, I
Defendant:
ACLU, KENNETH FAK and GAVIN M. ROSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CRAWFORD v. WATSON et al
as 2:2020cv00538
Defendant:
MARSHALL, EDWARDS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS DIRECTOR and others
Not Classified By Court:
KENNETH J. FALK and GAVIN ROSE
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO CRAWFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burdette v. Foote et al
as 1:2019cv00532
Defendant:
Fort Wayne Police Dept, Brandon Garrison, Gavin Dambra and others
Plaintiff:
Pierre Burdette and Mutahir El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCFATE v. COOK MEDICAL LLC et al
as 1:2018cv03698
Plaintiff:
GAVIN MCFATE
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GAVIN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv03435
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
SHELITA GAVIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MURRAY v. BROWN
as 2:2017cv00032
Respondent:
BROWN
Petitioner:
GAVIN MURRAY
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DIXON v. MAXIE et al
as 1:2016cv02128
Plaintiff:
JAQUELL DIXON
Defendant:
PENNY GAVINS, CELESTA JACKSON, NICOLE MAXIE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gavin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2016cv00356
Plaintiff:
Naomi R. Gavin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
