Cases 31 - 40 of 194
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Northern Physical Therapy, Chiropractic, & Acupuncture, PLLC et al
as 1:2022cv00568
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Co., GEICO Indemnity Co., GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Northern Physical Therapy, Chiropractic, & Acupuncture, PLLC, Sangwoo Mah, D.C., Seung-Hyuk Choi, P.T. and others
Not Classified By Court:
David P Horowitz
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. ADVANCED SPINE & PAIN MANAGEMENT LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv00319
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
ADVANCED SPINE & PAIN MANAGEMENT LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, NICHOLAS ROSANIA, D.C., VARINDER DHILLON, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO et al v. MIAN et al
as 3:2022cv00233
Defendant:
ATA CHAUDHRY, SHAHID MIAN, SURGERY CENTER OF ORADELL, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Gilberto Seco, M.D. et al
as 1:2021cv24155
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Co., Geico Indemnity Co., GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
Gilberto Seco, M.D., Med-Union Medical Center, Inc., Jorge A. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. David Kalin, M.D. et al
as 8:2021cv02556
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Co., Geico Indemnity Co., GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
David Kalin, M.D., Himes Walk In Clinic L.L.C., Maikel Cabrera L.M.T. and others
Not Classified By Court:
Gregory P. Holder and Norman Gerstein
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. EAST COAST SPINE, JOINT AND SPORTS MEDICINE PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2021cv19408
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
EAST COAST SPINE, JOINT AND SPORTS MEDICINE PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION d/b/a THE SPINE AND SPORTS HEALTH CENTER, ALEXANDER VISCO, M.D., MICHAEL KELLY, D.C. and others
Cross Claimant:
RON BEN-MEIR
Cross Defendant:
JOHN DE HOYOS, TORAL DOSHI and EAST COAST SPINE, JOINT AND SPORTS MEDICINE PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Faderani et al
as 1:2021cv23623
Defendant:
Compass Medical Centers Inc., M. Rahat Faderani, D.O., Dr. Rahat Faderani, DO, MPH, PA and others
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Co., Geico Indemnity Co., GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. ALTERNATIVE HEALTH CENTER, P.C. et al
as 2:2021cv18618
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
ALTERNATIVE HEALTH CENTER, P.C. and DONALD RACEK, D.C.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. DOUGLAS SPIEL, M.D., P.A. et al
as 2:2021cv11700
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO CASUALTY CO. and others
Defendant:
M.D. DOUGLAS SPIEL, M.D. FRANCIS PFLUM, M.D. RAJ RAVAL and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. FANO et al
as 2:2021cv10433
Defendant:
M.D. DELYS ST. HILL, M.D. RAVI PATEL, M.D. CYRUS KAO and others
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO CASUALTY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
