Cases 31 - 40 of 161
RHOADES v. THE GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00537
Plaintiff:
JORDAN RHOADES
Defendant:
THE GEO GROUP INC. and INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCRORY v. JAMERSON et al
as 1:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY MCCRORY
Defendant:
JASON P. JAMERSON, ROSEMARY KHOURY, SHEILA ASHLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKS v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv03109
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW S. BROOKS
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2021cv02862
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTUS MARSHALL
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC., SEVIER, K. GRINSTEAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. GEO GROUP INC et al
as 1:2021cv02856
Plaintiff:
TROY L. SMITH
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC, WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC, CENTURION MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILKINSON v. WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 1:2021cv02731
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. WILKINSON
Defendant:
WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES, CENTURION MEDICAL SERVICES, GEO GROUP INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAIN v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2021cv02556
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN CAIN
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC., SEVER, SEYE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CROCKETT-BERRY v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv02539
Plaintiff:
JAVON CROCKETT-BERRY
Defendant:
GEO GROUP, INC., JONES, WORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. HANNLEY et al
as 2:2021cv00335
Plaintiff:
ROBERT C. JONES
Defendant:
AMY HANNLEY, CRAIG CANNIFF, KENNETH STEVENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROWE v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv02327
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ALLEN ROWE
Defendant:
GEO GROUP, INC., SCOTT FITCH and WORTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
