Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
State of Maryland v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00459
Defendant: Cumberland Farms, Inc., Shell Oil Products Company LLC, Chevron Corporation and others
Plaintiff: State of Maryland
Intervenor Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. Amerada Hess Corp. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00312
Special Master: Ronald J. Hedges
Plaintiff: New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, The Commisisoner of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, The Administrator of the New Jersey Spill Compensation Fund and others
Defendant: Amerada Hess Corp., Rosemore Inc., Getty Properties Corp. and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Harbans Singh, Gurmail Singh and John and Jane Does Nos. 1-100
Not Classified By Court: Experimental Pathology Laboratories, Inc.
Cross Defendant: H.P. Delta, Inc.
Cross Claimant: Robert Melecci and Dhandi Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
The City of New York v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 1:2004cv03417
Defendant: El Paso CGP Company doing business as Coastal Oil New York, Inc. formerly known as Coastal Corporation, TRMI Holdings Inc., Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC and others
Plaintiff: Water Finance Agency, The Water Board and The City of New York
Petitioner: Gary Stumpf, Thomas M Milton, Meena Nainan and others
Material Witne: Barker Hamill
Special Master: Ronald J. Hedges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
GEORGE E. WARREN CORPORATION v. COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01205
Plaintiff: GEORGE E. WARREN CORPORATION
Defendant: COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GEORGE E. WARREN CORPORATION v. COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY
as 2:2016cv07731
Plaintiff: GEORGE E. WARREN CORPORATION
Defendant: COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Belda Shipping S.A. v. Tadema Shipping and Logistic Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00463
Plaintiff: Belda Shipping S.A.
Defendant: Tadema Shipping and Logistic Inc., Taleveras Petroleum Trading B.V. and Taleveras Petroleum Trading DMCC
Garnishee: Atlantic Trading & Marketing, Inc., BP Products North America Inc., Chevron U.S.A. Holdings Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Type: Contract Marine
Moran Towing Corporation v. Taleveras Petroleum Trading DMCC et al
as 1:2016cv00254
Plaintiff: Moran Towing Corporation
Defendant: Taleveras Petroleum Trading DMCC
Garnishee: Atlantic Trading & Marketing, Inc., BP Products North America Inc., Chevron U.S.A. Holdings Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Type: Contract Marine
Pontiaki Special Maritime Enterprise v. Tadema Shipping and Logistic Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00247
Plaintiff: Pontiaki Special Maritime Enterprise
Defendant: Tadema Shipping and Logistic Inc., Taleveras Petroleum Trading B.V. and Taleveras Petroleum Trading DMCC
Garnishee: Atlantic Trading & Marketing, Inc., BP Products North America Inc., Chevron U.S.A. Holdings Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Type: Contract Marine
United Shipping Services Ten Inc. v. Stena Weco A/S
as 1:2016cv00086
Plaintiff: United Shipping Services Ten Inc.
Defendant: Stena Weco A/S
Garnishee: Atlantic Trading & Marketing, Inc. , Chevron Corporation, Gavilon Fertilizer, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
City of New York v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 14-3224
Defendant: Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC, Leemilt's Petroleum Inc., Motiva Enterprises, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant: Mobile Corporation, ExxonMobil Oil Corporation and Exxon Mobil Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellee: City of New York, New York City Water Board and New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?