Cases 51 - 60 of 119
Rodgers v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2021cv00417
Plaintiff:
Charles Rodgers, Charles E Rodgers and Charles Rogers
Defendant:
George Payne, Justin McCray, Amber Goodrich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blanchard v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2021cv00160
Defendant:
Deputy Warden George Payne, Jr., Warden William Hyatte, George Payne, Jr and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Blanchard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2021cv00020
Defendant:
Shannon Evans, Alisha Conley, George Payne and others
Plaintiff:
French Mason
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strominger v. Indiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv01014
Defendant:
George Payne, Ronnie Neal, Jeremy Dykstra and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Strominger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STROMINGER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2020cv03124
Defendant:
GEORGE PAYNE, RONNIE NEAL, ROBERT E. CARTER and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND STROMINGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shake v. Payne et al
as 3:2020cv00931
Defendant:
L T Myers, George Payne and Bennett
Plaintiff:
Jerry Donald Shake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seay v. Peters et al
as 2:2020cv01668
Defendant:
Officer Harrison, George Payne, Kenneth Peters and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance Marquaz Seay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Payne et al
as 3:2020cv00828
Defendant:
Hensley, Sams, Hoffman and others
Plaintiff:
Malik X Wilson
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Payne et al
as 3:2020cv00829
Defendant:
Hyatte, J Shaw, George Payne and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. Hyatt et al
as 3:2020cv00771
Plaintiff:
Jason Michael Gibson and Jason Gibson
Defendant:
R Bennett, William Hyatt, George Payne, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
