Cases 81 - 90 of 296
Antonio Pearson v. Secretary Department of Correc, et al
as 13-1412
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO PEARSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDENT GERALD ROZUM, DEPT. SUPT. SYLVIA GIBSON and others
Aaron Sloan v. Gerald Rozum, et al
as 13-1413
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON SLOAN
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALD ROZUM
Harvey Weaver v. John Palkovich, et al
as 13-1369
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARVEY WEAVER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN PALKOVICH, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and others
Paul Cosentino v. Gerald Rozum, et al
as 13-1201
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL COSENTINO
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALD ROZUM, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PIKE COUNTY and others
In re: Carl Whitehead, et al
as 13-1168
Petitioner:
In re: CARL WHITEHEAD
Respondent:
GERALD ROZUM and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
John Lebron v. Gerald Rozum
as 13-1186
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN LEBRON
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALD ROZUM
BEY v. ROZUM et al
as 2:2013cv00325
Petitioner:
BABAESU BEY
Respondent:
GERALD ROZUM, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MS. LINDA L. KELIY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keith Warrington v. Gerald Rozum
as 13-1085
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH WARRINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALD ROZUM, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Antonio Pearson v. Bureau of Corrections Industry, et al
as 13-1065
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO PEARSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BUREAU OF CORRECTIONS INDUSTRY, VIEWSONIC CORP, VIEWSONIC CORPORATION'S CFO SUNG YI and others
ALICEA v. ROZUM et al
as 5:2012cv07025
Petitioner:
JOSE ORLANDO ALICEA
Respondent:
GERALD ROZUM, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
