Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gifford v. Phillip et al
as 3:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
Adam Clayton Gifford
Defendant:
Weldy Phillip, Derek Daugherty, Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gifford v. Hamilton County Government
as 1:2022cv00245
Plaintiff:
Bradford Anthony Gifford
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Jim Hammond and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greenberg v. Slatery et al
as 3:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Daniel S. Greenberg
Defendant:
Herbert Slatery, Amber Seymour Barker, Joseph Woodruff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gifford v. Sensio, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00935
Plaintiff:
Karen Gifford
Defendant:
Sensio, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Walker v. Youker et al
as 3:2021cv00010
Defendant:
A. Gifford, K. Spry, J. Floyd and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gifford v. Fuller et al
as 1:2019cv00228
Plaintiff:
Adam Clayton Gifford
Defendant:
Scotty McKay, Jason Taylor, Tracie Partin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gifford, II v. Bedford County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2015cv00016
Plaintiff:
David Gifford, II
Defendant:
Bedford County, Tennessee , Bedford County Sheriff's Department , Bedford County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gifford v. Bedford County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2015cv00007
Defendant:
Bedford County, Tennessee, Bedford County Correctional Facility, Bedford County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
David Gifford, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gifford v. Hall et al
as 3:2013cv00721
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Gifford
Defendant:
Darron Hall, Melissa Chilton and Sherry Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
