Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Gifford v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2023cv00332
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Gifford
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Derek Dennis, Kendall Gooden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gifford v. Ethicon, Inc. et al.
as 2:2018cv00814
Plaintiff:
Astrid Gifford
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gifford v. Ethicon, Inc. et al.
as 2:2018cv00815
Plaintiff:
Barbara Gifford
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gifford v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv10647
Plaintiff:
Johanna Gifford
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Biotech, Inc. and Cook Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gifford-Neate v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv10051
Plaintiff:
Tamara Gifford-Neate
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gifford v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv09098
Plaintiff:
Sherry Gifford
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Gifford's, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv04175
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Gifford's, Inc. and Gifford D. Purdue
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Gifford et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02632
Plaintiff:
Dixie C. Gifford and Reldon Gifford
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
