Cases 1 - 10 of 15
GILL v. FAYETTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. (FCSD) et al
as 1:2023cv01766
Plaintiff:
JORDAN MATTHEW GILL
Defendant:
FAYETTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. (FCSD), CONNERSVILLE POLICE DEPT. (CPD), CLINT BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBride v. Bane et al
as 3:2023cv00261
Plaintiff:
Curtis L McBride and Curtis McBride
Defendant:
Pam Bane, Cross, Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Beasle et al
as 3:2021cv00665
Plaintiff:
Audrain Jones
Defendant:
Beasle, Ron Neal, Winn and others
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH et al v. SAINT PAUL TRAVELERS COMPANY INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00598
Defendant:
BOB STELLER, MOBILE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT INC., EDDIE CURRAN and others
Plaintiff:
EDMOND HUDMOND SMITH, IV and LOUIS HOLGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HORTON v. PETERS
as 1:2014cv00164
Petitioner:
KENNETH A. HORTON
Respondent:
GILL PETERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SISK v. INDIANA et al
as 2:2013cv00383
Defendant:
PAMLA BAILS, BOBBIE BELDEN, CHRISTINE CLEMENS and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SISK
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLOPTON v. PETERS
as 3:2012cv00013
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CLOPTON
Defendant:
GILL PETERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gill v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2010cv00134
Plaintiff:
Michael J Gill
Defendant:
A Rodriguez, Brian Perez and Osborne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Superintendent
as 3:2010cv00026
Petitioner:
Stanley A Gill
Defendant:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TICKLE v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2009cv00267
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL WAYNE TICKLE
Defendant:
MITCHELL E. DANIELS, JR., EDWIN BUSS, ELTON AMOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
