Cases filed in Virginia
Cases 31 - 40 of 72
Nolan v. Clarke et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2018cv00408
Defendant: Harold Clarke, Nurse Mays, Sergeant Tisdale and others
Plaintiff: Eugene D. Nolan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Hill et al
as 3:2018cv00516
Plaintiff: Anthony Gilbert Gill
Defendant: Barbara J. Hill, Mark Worth Eder, Irene Syneider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Hill et al
as 4:2018cv00099
Plaintiff: Anthony Gilbert Gill
Defendant: Barbara J. Hill, Irene Syneider, Carolyn Michelle McRae and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00335
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wooden-Harris v. Fenner et al
as 2:2018cv00332
Plaintiff: Wesley Joseph Wooden-Harris
Defendant: Fenner and Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Bishop, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00263
Plaintiff: James Henry Simpson
Defendant: Mortrsh Disha, Michael Poerstel, Brook Pettit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Clarke et al
as 3:2017cv00792
Plaintiff: Anthony G. Gill
Defendant: R. Clarke, R. A. Everette, A. Ellison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Simpson v. Circuit Court of City of Richmond et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00470
Plaintiff: James Henry Simpson
Defendant: Circuit Court of City of Richmond, Nuckels S Bivinly, Holter Stout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00454
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Gill v. Clarke
as 2:2016cv00709
Petitioner: Lashawn Gill
Respondent: Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?