Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 41 - 50 of 87
Mohawk Carpet Distribution, Inc. v. Gill Carrier, Inc.
as 1:2017cv04752
Plaintiff: Mohawk Carpet Distribution, Inc.
Defendant: Gill Carrier, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
CARD, et al v. DOE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00138
Plaintiff: STEPHEN W CARD, DARREN LAMOTTE, LEVI ARTHUR FEDD and others
Defendant: John Doe, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER, CORRECTIONAL DOCTORS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARD, et al v. DOE et al
as 5:2017cv00310
Plaintiff: STEPHEN W CARD, DARREN LAMOTTE, LEVI ARTHUR FEDD and others
Defendant: JOHN DOE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER, CORRECTIONAL DOCTORS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01843
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Brown v. DeKalb County, Georgia et al
as 1:2017cv01780
Plaintiff: Darnell Brown
Defendant: DeKalb County, Georgia , C.R. Gill and D.L. Craig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03892
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00138
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
GILL v. RESCARE BEHAVIOR SERVICES INC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00103
Plaintiff: CYNTHIA GILL
Defendant: RESCARE BEHAVIOR SERVICES INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MANFRED v. GILL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00092
Plaintiff: MARKANTHONY MANFRED, JR
Defendant: GILL and WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rutledge v. Corizon Health et al
as 1:2016cv00669
Plaintiff: Gregory Rutledge, Jr.
Defendant: Corizon Health, Tunisia Gill and Kerry Slim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?